3 ms·
Another well received paper [1], but I want to point out that ICLR should really have an industry track. The type of research in [1] (exhaustive analytic study
by justicezyx 6y ago
Another well received paper [1], but I want to point out that ICLR should really have an industry track.
The type of research in [1] (exhaustive analytic study on various parameters on RL training), is clearly beyond typical academia environment, probably also beyond normal industry labs. Note the paper was from Google Brain.
The study consumes a lot of people's time, and computing time. It's no doubt very useful and valuable. But I dont think they should be judged by the same group of reviewers with the other work from normal universities.
[1] https://openreview.net/forum?id=nIAxjsniDzg https://openreview.net/forum?id=nIAxjsniDzg
- brg 6y agoWhile it wouldn't hurt, I don't think it is necessary. As with any large ML conference, many reviewers are in industry. I don't know the mix of industry to academic reviewers, but would not be surprised if it was biased towards industry supported research.