2 ms·
> Via training on new inputs? There are no new inputs in this case because we got replaced editors with NN.
by dominotw 6y ago
> Via training on new inputs?
There are no new inputs in this case because we got replaced editors with NN.
- coldtea 6y agoNothing stops us from feeding them the work of human editors in 2000000 other publications... Or their own work, as ranked by readers (e.g. their past posts that had the more views and better engagement).
- RobertKerans 6y agoNo. This is drastically missing the point of what The Economist (or almost any media org) is. It isn't trying to be an average from 20000000 other publications, or what an average of readers think, or what had good engagement stats (though obviously the latter is a good target for the application of analytical software). It's not a neutral voice, or some down-the-middle average of what readers liked. It's an entity with its own political goals.