Would have to be tested in court. Certainly, the fact that competing encyclopedias exist, and have for hundreds of years, with > 99% identical entry names (but

Would have to be tested in court. Certainly, the fact that competing encyclopedias exist, and have for hundreds of years, with > 99% identical entry names (but of course, substantively different content), and that predicated not on any given invention or IP but rather the common use English language, would, I think, make the judges rather reluctant to rule differently even should there be 100% match in entries.