4 ms·
Can you be more specific about the differences your talking about? As far as I'm aware, Google never added their own features to the language itself. Granted, t
by dlubarov 6y ago
Can you be more specific about the differences your talking about? As far as I'm aware, Google never added their own features to the language itself. Granted, they were a bit slow to support new versions like Java 8. They also chose not to support libraries like awt, but I wouldn't consider those part of the Java language; rather they're part of Java SE.
- BoorishBears 6y agoI already mentioned multiple above.
- Daho0n 6y agoNo, you mentioned things Google didn't implement. That's not the same as making it incompatible. In this case that would be Google adding things to Java, not skipping some.
- BoorishBears 6y agoWhat on earth are you on about? Not supporting random parts of a contract programs rely on to function makes your platform incompatible. Especially when you claim support for an update but then randomly cut out parts of the functionality. In what universe does incompatibility somehow require... adding "things"... like what? I don't have much patience for people so out of their depth they don't understand the table stakes for a meaningful conversation on a topic.