4 ms·
It’s generally not trademark infringement to refer to the actual thing the trademark refers to (”nominative use”). This would actually be a claim unlikely to su
by zeroonetwothree 6y ago
It’s generally not trademark infringement to refer to the actual thing the trademark refers to (”nominative use”).
This would actually be a claim unlikely to succeed unless you are intentionally claiming that are writing the true original Harry Potter stories.
- max-ibel 6y agoTell that to the Sir Arthur Conan Doyle estate :) I don't know if their beef is with copyright vs trademark.