3 ms·
The majority opinion cited precedent (Feist) that copyright is not intended to profit the creator. It's to advance the progress of arts and sciences. If someone
by jacques_chester 6y ago
The majority opinion cited precedent (Feist) that copyright is not intended to profit the creator. It's to advance the progress of arts and sciences. If someone copies your amazing API, that sucks for you, but it's not stopping the progress of arts and sciences.
- gfodor 6y agoYes fair point I misread the OP that they were strictly talking about the legal tradeoffs. I was more thinking what was the actual cost to creators under this version of fair use.