3 ms·
"even if I granted that Apple was solely responsible for WebKit" Straw man. Nobody said that. Nobody implied that. "So if we're being thankful of browser vend
by sjwright 15y ago
"even if I granted that Apple was solely responsible for WebKit"
Straw man. Nobody said that. Nobody implied that.
"So if we're being thankful of browser vendors"
I wasn't been thankful of browser vendors. If I was, I'd be thankful to Google for Chrome. In fact I'm being thankful for WebKit which freed the world from a long tail of shitty in-house mobile browsers.
I don't want to be misconstrued as an Apple fanboy, but surely credit should be due when it's due. Apple (through David Hyatt and others) took a ghettoized library and turned it into a cross-platform, cross-ecosystem, cross-device library so good that companies like Google and Nokia can't help but contribute massively.
No question Chrome is the superior implementation of WebKit on the desktop. Chrome iterates faster, but it's iteration on the back of giants.
Similarly the KHTML team deserves recognition, but even they will admit their plans didn't go beyond the KDE ecosystem.
- ZeroGravitas 15y agoI'd start with thanking Mozilla, since if they didn't create the potential for a vendor-neutral web then Safari and the iPhone's compatability issues (which were already substantial, since they actually followed standards) would have been insurmountable and the hegemony of IE6 would have continued to this day (and incidentally prevented Apple's resurgence which was partly built on iPods, but partly built on having a semi-compatible version of IE and Office, then Safari after IE got killed.)