4 ms·
that's not really the same thing. the football player didn't realize a loss in any of those years, at least not in the same way that a company can. they just ma
by leetcrew 6y ago
that's not really the same thing. the football player didn't realize a loss in any of those years, at least not in the same way that a company can. they just made less money over time. the real difference here is there are no marginal brackets for taxes paid by a company.
it makes sense that companies are taxed differently than individuals. corporate revenues and assets ultimately end up in the pockets of real people, either as wages or capital gains.
that said, I do think you make a good point about income tax. it would be more fair if there were some smoothing over time. another example of someone who might get screwed is a contractor with highly variable income. if I make $75k every year, and you oscillate back and forth between $25k and $125k, you pay a lot more income tax for no real reason.
- bradleyjg 6y ago> it makes sense that companies are taxed differently than individuals. corporate revenues and assets ultimately end up in the pockets of real people, either as wages or capital gains. But only some of those real people are subject to the jurisdiction of the country taxing the corporation. So while some corporate income is subject to double taxation some is not. > the real difference here is there are no marginal brackets for taxes paid by a company. Companies can smear revenue out over time to optimize the taxes they face. People cannot. The marginal part is orthogonal.