5 ms·

I strongly disagree. He wrote popular science books but I’d argue that they are not that good at all whenever he veers away from his expertise. His stuff on neu

I strongly disagree. He wrote popular science books but I’d argue that they are not that good at all whenever he veers away from his expertise. His stuff on neuroscience is just out there. There is definitely room for scientists who must inspire and inform the public but no one has replaced the era of Feynman and Sagan. Maybe Bill Nye, he seems the most level-headed popular science guy this side of the pond. The likes of Neil and Michio are just lots of air and not much substance and it’s doing science education a great disservice in my opinion.

ablekh 6y ago
His books are not good overall? Not much substance? Well, based on relevant ratings on Amazon, the absolute majority of Michio's readers strongly disagree with you. Your mention of Feynman etc. is ridiculous, considering that you have previously talked about comparison with "the average schmuck". Why are you suddenly changing the topic of the conversation?
- tehWeeb 6y ago
  The majority of his reviews are “average schmucks”. Would they know if he’s wrong?
  - ablekh 6y ago
    That's exactly my point. The OP's question was not about whether he's right or wrong. It was: "why do we care what he thinks ... anymore than what the average schmuck thinks?". The stellar review performance proves that, for the reasons I outlined above, we, average schmucks, do care what he thinks.
selimthegrim 6y ago
Kaku used to work with Bunji Sakita, who was the real deal and did a lot of stuff in what is today called hard condensed matter as well (sliding CDWs / phasons / manifestation of N-G bosons). This is real disrespect to the literature, and strongly disagreeing without having read it is pretty worthless.