3 ms·

Australian WHO doctor: Here’s what we found about the origins of the coronavirus

grumpyautist 6y ago
The WHO? Like I am supposed to trust an organization that doesn't even know taiwan exists
- a0-prw 6y ago
  Of course they know it exists. They tried to avoid engaging in attempts to politicise a health crisis. Also, only 14 of the 193 member states of the UN recognise Taiwan as an independant nation, and "WHO" stands for World Health Organisation. If your criterion for who to trust is recognition of Taiwan as independent of PRC, I suggest you take a look at your list of trustworthy countries here: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-that-recognize-taiwan https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries...
  - grumpyautist 6y ago
    I'd take the opinion of someone who isn't under china's heel, which the WHO has shown to be. Or did everyone collectively forget this https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/02/china-coronavirus-who-health-soft-power/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/02/china-coronavirus-who-h...
xxel 6y ago
I have seen all seasons of X-Fikes and that WHO looks like seen all seasons too. Bats again but cant find in Bats. From lab it was not possible to escape for a virus because WHO seen they have security cammeras. Top-Noch bullshit. The best part WHO was taking interview from the first patient in China :D Our investigations concluded the virus was most likely of animal origin. It probably crossed over to humans from bats, via an as-yet-unknown intermediary animal, at an unknown location. Such “zoonotic” diseases have triggered pandemics before. But we are still working to confirm the exact chain of events that led to the current pandemic. Sampling of bats in Hubei province and wildlife across China has revealed no SARS-CoV-2 to date. _ WHO is World Hoax Organisation
Proven 6y ago
> We visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is an impressive research facility, and looks to be run well, with due regard to staff health. Maybe (although I find that hard to believe) it now is, but we know about a number of concerns raised about that in recent years, and that they conducted gain in function research. What he saw was what he was allowed to see more than a year after the fact. We know that a lot of evidence was destroyed and tampered with by the government. I wouldn't give this report much weight.

The WHO? Like I am supposed to trust an organization that doesn't even know taiwan exists

a0-prw 6y ago
Of course they know it exists. They tried to avoid engaging in attempts to politicise a health crisis. Also, only 14 of the 193 member states of the UN recognise Taiwan as an independant nation, and "WHO" stands for World Health Organisation. If your criterion for who to trust is recognition of Taiwan as independent of PRC, I suggest you take a look at your list of trustworthy countries here: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-that-recognize-taiwan https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries...
- grumpyautist 6y ago
  I'd take the opinion of someone who isn't under china's heel, which the WHO has shown to be. Or did everyone collectively forget this https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/02/china-coronavirus-who-health-soft-power/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/02/china-coronavirus-who-h...

xxel 6y ago

I have seen all seasons of X-Fikes and that WHO looks like seen all seasons too. Bats again but cant find in Bats. From lab it was not possible to escape for a virus because WHO seen they have security cammeras. Top-Noch bullshit. The best part WHO was taking interview from the first patient in China :D Our investigations concluded the virus was most likely of animal origin. It probably crossed over to humans from bats, via an as-yet-unknown intermediary animal, at an unknown location. Such “zoonotic” diseases have triggered pandemics before. But we are still working to confirm the exact chain of events that led to the current pandemic. Sampling of bats in Hubei province and wildlife across China has revealed no SARS-CoV-2 to date. _ WHO is World Hoax Organisation

Proven 6y ago

> We visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is an impressive research facility, and looks to be run well, with due regard to staff health. Maybe (although I find that hard to believe) it now is, but we know about a number of concerns raised about that in recent years, and that they conducted gain in function research. What he saw was what he was allowed to see more than a year after the fact. We know that a lot of evidence was destroyed and tampered with by the government. I wouldn't give this report much weight.