5 ms·
Reading some of the comments here about entering your phone number on this site, I don’t believe there’s as much as risk as people seem to think. If the site we
by cantrevealname 6y ago
Reading some of the comments here about entering your phone number on this site, I don’t believe there’s as much as risk as people seem to think. If the site were asking you to enter your username and password to check if it’s on a pwned list, well, yes, that would be a dumb thing to do.
But a telephone number is telling the website operator at most that the phone might be associated with you, but all he learns about you is your IP address and possibly your browser fingerprint. He doesn’t get your name, Facebook ID, email address, interests, password, or anything else.
Now you might say that he can see your Facebook ID or email address in the list of leaked data, and possibly through the Facebook password reset user interface as well. But he could have done that anyway without you ever having supplied the phone number. He has the entire leaked list and it seems that pretty much anyone can get the leaked list with modest effort.
Furthermore phone numbers by themselves carry very little information because they are not sparse. If I give you a correctly formatted 10 digit number like nnn-nnn-nnnn, there’s a quite good chance that it’s a working North American telephone number. By correctly formatted, I mean that it has a valid area code, that the prefix doesn’t begin with a 1 or 0, that the prefix is not 555 (that’s for movies you know), etc. If you follow those rules, I once worked out that you’d have a 20% chance that you’d get a working phone number.
The point is that keeping your random 10 digit phone number off the Internet offers you no additional security or privacy. Phone spammers can test call every possible North American telephone number just as hackers can scan every IP4 network address in the world (only 2^32 of those).
Associating the phone number with your name is bad, I agree. That allows targeted attacks (and targeted spam calls). But you are not giving your name to this website operator. You’re giving him 10 digits — he could have pulled 10 digits out of thin air and it would likely have been someone’s phone number anyway.
- vinni2 6y agoIn my country my phone number is associated with everything from my electronic identification to bank transactions. It is part of a multi factor authentication. Giving up my phone number would weaken one of those factors. I don’t like it but the system is like that I don’t have much choice. If my phone number could be linked to my Facebook data then I am giving away a lot more information than just my phone number.
- ubercow13 6y agoBest put your phone number into this site then, so you can find out if you need to change it.
- crispyambulance 6y agoOn the other hand, putting one's phone number into that site, or any other utterly anonymous random site (what the F is "newseachday.com" ?) on a whim, is a mistake.
- davidjohnstone 6y agoYou haven't heard of thenewseachday.com because I quietly put it up online last week.
- crispyambulance 6y agoSo? What reason would I have to trust it? Seriously. I expect you mean well, but the "news" on that site is just an aggregator, like millions of sites with no-so-good intentions. This isn't a good "trust-me" look.
- natch 6y agoHow about answering ashkankiani’s question?
- Hnrobert42 6y agoWhy is it a mistake? Of what value is a valid phone number absent any other contextual information? Given a day or two, I could write a script to generate and submit all valid phone numbers in the world. Would everyone be doomed by my having entered their numbers?
- natch 6y agoThe contextual information is in the leaked data, which you should assume they have a copy of.
- natch 6y agoIf you are in the breach, the site operator already has your name. And now they will also have your IP address. Yes I realize not all users will enter a phone number that is their own. But for those that do, they’ve just added valuable information to the data held by the site operator, in the nefarious scenario.