4 ms·

If you compare word processors to note taking apps of today which I think are very equivalent to the same use you'll find more than 55 tools. Word processors b

If you compare word processors to note taking apps of today which I think are very equivalent to the same use you'll find more than 55 tools. Word processors belong to an era where the computer replaced the typewriter and it's not needed any more these days. You can find commercial, free or open source note taking apps that are local or cloud based and offer a huge variety of features.

2421n 6y ago
You could likely more than 55 open source text editors too. I could name at least 15 offhand, I think.
- JamesAdir 6y ago
  That's a good comparison also to the word processors of the 80's.
jolux 6y ago
I do wonder whether note-taking apps will condense over time too though, as our phones continue to become bigger extensions of our intellectual activity.
open-source-ux 6y ago
"If you compare word processors to note taking apps of today which I think are very equivalent to the same use" Are they really equivalent though? A word processor - with multi-page documents, pagination, rich formatting and layout, footnotes, headers, footers, ToC (table of contents) and so much more - seems a magnitude greater than simply a note-taking app. I can understand why many developers might tackle a simple note app (or a simple blog generator, or static site generator). But a word processor feels like a much more complex beast.
- anaerobicover 6y ago
  In general commercial note-taking apps are not at all simple; they have similar features to those you named. Also consider that automatic syncing across devices (at least, if not also across platforms) is practically a sine qua non, which is complex it its own right.
  - canadianfella 6y ago
    Why latin?
- robenkleene 6y ago
  All of that complexity has been replaced by sync (e.g., collaborative editing as one example of). Sync is the problem of our era and it branches out in many directions (e.g., infinitely restorable, branching, searchable history).

2421n 6y ago

You could likely more than 55 open source text editors too. I could name at least 15 offhand, I think.

JamesAdir 6y ago
That's a good comparison also to the word processors of the 80's.

jolux 6y ago

I do wonder whether note-taking apps will condense over time too though, as our phones continue to become bigger extensions of our intellectual activity.

open-source-ux 6y ago

"If you compare word processors to note taking apps of today which I think are very equivalent to the same use" Are they really equivalent though? A word processor - with multi-page documents, pagination, rich formatting and layout, footnotes, headers, footers, ToC (table of contents) and so much more - seems a magnitude greater than simply a note-taking app. I can understand why many developers might tackle a simple note app (or a simple blog generator, or static site generator). But a word processor feels like a much more complex beast.

anaerobicover 6y ago
In general commercial note-taking apps are not at all simple; they have similar features to those you named. Also consider that automatic syncing across devices (at least, if not also across platforms) is practically a sine qua non, which is complex it its own right.
- canadianfella 6y ago
  Why latin?
robenkleene 6y ago
All of that complexity has been replaced by sync (e.g., collaborative editing as one example of). Sync is the problem of our era and it branches out in many directions (e.g., infinitely restorable, branching, searchable history).