4 ms·

Neither is legal, I'm not sure what your point is?

• temp8964 6y ago
  No. The second is legal.
  • seoaeu 6y ago
    Cutting workers' pay as retaliation for unionizing is illegal.
    • temp8964 6y ago
      It is not retaliation at all. Unionization changes how the company works, payment can be changed accordingly.
      • ceejayoz 6y ago
        https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-samples/hr-qa/Pages/preventunionorganization.aspx https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/tools-and-samples/hr-... > The acronym TIPS can help remind employers not to: > * Threaten—never threaten to retaliate against employees by terminating them or reducing pay or benefits. > * Interrogate—do not interrogate employees about their activities or activities of co-workers. > * Promise—do not promise anything to employees, such as promotio ns or benefits, in exchange for not supporting the union. > * Surveillance/Spying—never spy on union activities.
        • temp8964 6y ago
          The tweet didn't do any of those.
          • ceejayoz 6y ago
            Repeatedly asserting that doesn’t make it true.
  • anon_tor_12345 6y ago
    There's a list a mile long of court cases at all federal levels that disagree with you. So I'm just curious according to what definition of legal do you think it's legal?