Do we have a really 'relatively free market of competing ideas?" It feels like a lot of the core principles are so strongly bolted in place that any argument w

Do we have a really 'relatively free market of competing ideas?" It feels like a lot of the core principles are so strongly bolted in place that any argument we can have is the equivalent of arguing about paint and the positioning of furniture, not the actual floor plan anymore. Is there any place in the current Western system to meaningfully argue the paradigm of private property rights, or the freedom to contract?