3 ms·
If you don't have low ratios and tracking, you end up targeting the 33rd percentile and seeing: * Where the lower-third of the class gets with instruction with
by mlyle 6y ago
If you don't have low ratios and tracking, you end up targeting the 33rd percentile and seeing:
* Where the lower-third of the class gets with instruction with slightly too difficult material and not quite enough coaching.
* Where the middle-third gets with excessive coaching on slightly too easy material.
* Where the upper-third gets on their own with little help, occasionally bored by and impeded by the path of the overall class.
This is somewhere affluence matters-- if you have parent volunteers showing up and hanging out to intensively coach (under the teacher's direction) the lowest readers and to challenge / help higher readers pick out books... it makes a big difference on how well class time is used. The teacher can aim square for the middle. And the stronger kids get some enrichment and opportunity for further growth.
Why the 33rd percentile? Because a classroom with 1/6th of kids not getting it at all and 1/6th kind-of getting it.. is infinitely more workable than a classroom with 1/4th not getting it at all and 1/4th kind-of getting it.
- sokoloff 6y agoI agree that involved parents is a massive lever on achievement. I suspect there’s 100x more parental involvement and targeted enrichment activities outside of school than inside of school.
- mlyle 6y agoMost parents just let their kids crank on whatever academics are, and maybe help with a difficult assignment or two... even in affluent schools with involved parents. But having a couple parents show up to reading time and teachers' aides... makes such a big difference in K-1.