4 ms·

> Imagine if we could connect your brain directly to a computer. Please, no. I’d just get even more frustrated at how slow the damn thing is.

• IgorPartola 6y ago
  There is so much about it that I think would be wrong, difficult, bad and we as a species can’t even imagine what it would be like. How do you install an ad blocker on an interface like that?
  • ElFitz 6y ago
    Very good question. Regarding the ad blocker, one thing I definitely can’t wait for are true AR glasses that could act as a real-life ad blocker. Being out in the street doesn’t mean I have in any way agreed to being constantly drowned in and have my attention stolen away by all this bloody noise.
• katzgrau 6y ago
  I'd argue we already connected ourselves to computers, and we're just using the safest but slowest adapters available right now.
  • ElFitz 6y ago
    We could argue on "safest", but definitely the compromise on speed, ease of use and safety that I can think of that I’m the most comfortable with
    • qayxc 6y ago
      I'm curious, what would a solution look like that's even safer than a touch interface (mouse, keyboard, screen) or voice?
      • ElFitz 6y ago
        Well, removing audio and images, leaving only text, would make it safer. I, and probably many others, wouldn’t have stumbled upon some of the things I have. They thankfully are now only blurry memories to me, even though merely evoking them still is nauseating. It would also dramatically reduce the impact of much of the bullshit content out there, since words appear to have much less emotional impact than images (and appear to be much less appealing), and thus be safer to society as a whole. A text-only interface would also be much less useful and much more annoying to use.
        • all2 6y ago
          > since words appear to have much less emotional impact than images To some. My imagination is quite good and as a child I consumed vast quantities of print media. A lot of it wasn't appropriate for a child to consume.
          • jamiek88 6y ago
            Same here, as evidenced when one rainy Saturday afternoon the family were all together after lunch, grandparents drinking tea, me cross legged on the floor reading when I innocently asked the room “hey, what does cunt mean?’ Grandma turned puce and dad snatched the book from me, wtf are you reading? James Herbert’s Rats trilogy. Aged 8. Warped ever since. Text is plenty.
            • spiralx 6y ago
              I couldn't understand why my parents didn't like me calling my brother an orgasm after I had read the term in a book and liked the sound of it :)
          • ElFitz 6y ago
            Sure. It can already be a lot. Some of my worst nightmares come from my own imagination. But we’re talking safer, not absolutely, perfectly safest. Also, how would you compare that to the close-up picture of an Iraqi soldier burned to a crisp by a Hellfire missile, hanging out of the carcass of his scorched vehicle, staring straight into your eyes with his charred, empty eye sockets? Or suddenly being confronted, at 12 years old, by dozens of neatly aligned child pornography thumbnails after clicking on some unclearly named link when exploring I2P, FreeNet and TOR because "decentralised", "anonymous" and "censorship-resistant" networks seemed "cool"? There’s a reason crap people’s magazines are full of pictures, paparazzi photos can be worth what they are, and websites with a photo of a smiling human (and a clear CTA) convert better than those without. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]