11 ms·
> "I would argue that ideas can't be stolen - only the execution can." The legal definition of theft in most countries is based on someone (A) depriving anothe
by lloeki 15y ago
> "I would argue that ideas can't be stolen - only the execution can."
The legal definition of theft in most countries is based on someone (A) depriving another person (B) of a given entity. It is fundamentally the transfer of the entity to A which removes it from B.
It therefore cannot apply to an idea, for which A getting his hand onto the idea will not make B forget about it.
For copyrighted works, creating a copy is is not depriving someone of the original entity, so it is not stealing, but counterfeiting.
Along the same vein, you can't steal something from someone if he has not acquired it in the first place. Creating a copy of an entity and selling it or giving it for free might cause monetary grief to the original owner (which might sell his entity for less, if at all, than if the copy did not exist), but it is not stealing either.
- kristofferR 15y agoI agree with you on the legal definition of theft. I meant theft in the normal way it's used in the language - as taking/copying something that doesn't belong to you. However, you're absolutely right that counterfeiting/copyright infringement is not theft in the legal sense.
- Ruudjah 15y agoEven in the 'normal way' theft is not the same as taking something or copying something. Maybe a lot of interpretations of taking/copying are labelled theft; it does not mean the term theft is used correctly. In this case, I would argue that theft is pretty much equivalent to the legal definition.