4 ms·
> Because they wouldn't question it if the person in question was male. You don't know that. This has become one of those ridiculous "truisms" that isn't neces
by sidlls 6y ago
> Because they wouldn't question it if the person in question was male.
You don't know that. This has become one of those ridiculous "truisms" that isn't necessarily true, at this point.
- elliekelly 6y agoOr perhaps it is a “truism” with a long and repeatedly documented history of being true: https://www.rti.org/insights/myth-female-hysteria-and-health-disparities-among-women https://www.rti.org/insights/myth-female-hysteria-and-health...
- sidlls 6y agoThis is a forum with a bunch of (pseudo) technophiles. I'd expect them to be more, rather than less, inclined to believe someone who got sensors and other data together. The expressed skepticism isn't gender motivated.