Philosophically I prefer the idea of "one tool for the job", and I don't like the idea that systemd has swallowed so many different services (from udev to dhcpd

Philosophically I prefer the idea of "one tool for the job", and I don't like the idea that systemd has swallowed so many different services (from udev to dhcpd). But practically? It just works. It is consistent, very well documented, and I have to say that it has saved me a lot of time - writing systemd unit-files is almost a pleasure. So, while I understand some people have very strong views, I'm kinda OK with systemd having "won". Maybe in 20 years we'll have something different offered, and people will be hugging their systemd and refusing to move away from it?