4 ms·
> but at what point do we consider the daily scaremongering by people with an agenda? Indeed, at what point do we consider that? Is it after half the world ha
by argvargc 6y ago
> but at what point do we consider the daily scaremongering by people with an agenda?
Indeed, at what point do we consider that?
Is it after half the world has been indoctrinated into taking a several-month old experimental medicine for an illness that the overwhelming majority of people under the age of ordinary life-expectancy survive - or, more commonly - barely notice?
Or is it after we've spent so many trillions on that illness so as to be able to turn each and every one of the 9 million per year of us who simply do actually starve to death each and every year, into a millionaire?
Yes, do please tell us about daily scaremongering by people with an agenda and how bad it is for everyone, you just go right ahead and do that.
- aww_dang 6y agoWhat exactly is the anti-vaccine agenda? The great reset, ID2020 program has been described in detail for anyone curious enough to do basic research. Many of the proponents have been open about their agenda. I'm not sure what the OP is implying here.
- orra 6y agoYour anti vax bullshit is wrong and misleading, on so many levels.
- argvargc 6y agoThere's a significant difference between being reluctant to take a brand new, experimental medicine that exhibits high risk factors and low benefits, versus being opposed to vaccines per se. Absolutely not opposed to the latter, vaccines are and have been of tremendously huge benefit to humanity.
- orra 6y agoThe vaccines are new but they're not experimental. They have been through the standard trials and statistical analyses.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> The vaccines are new but they're not experimental. They have been through the standard trials and statistical analyses. Not the full spectrum, the trials are still ongoing. That’s why they have, in the US (and the equivalent in many other jurisdictions) Emergency Use Authorizations, not regular approvals.
- orra 6y agoI'm objecting to the term "experimental". Each of the Oxford-AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines all have Conditional Marketing Authorisation in the EU. The EU contrasts this as being much more robust and stringent that a mere Emergency Use Authorisation. See the section “What are the different data requirements between an Emergency Use Authorisation and a Conditional Marketing Authorisation, and what are the potential consequences of these?” https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_2390 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_...