4 ms·
If it would be EU sponsored NGO doing this, you would argue it's a department of truth proxy wouldn't you?
by wormik 6y ago
If it would be EU sponsored NGO doing this, you would argue it's a department of truth proxy wouldn't you?
- temp8964 6y agoOf course. I assume there are concerned citizens in the EU can do this. Why does the government need to get involved in this?
- oblio 6y agoYou're being silly. To take an extreme scenario, if the KGB is financing entities spouting non-sense in various publications, you expect the US/CIA to just take it lying down? :-) It's part of intelligence/counter-intelligence, you have to control the narrative because the average citizen isn't well informed enough and will just end up believing what the other party tells them... because they're the only ones saying anything. Private individuals can do this, but governments have been doing this too, since the beginning of time (and of governments).
- temp8964 6y agoSo the Brexit to EU is like KGB to US? Why do you want to keep UK inside EU then?
- oblio 6y agoI'm not keeping anything, anywhere. The UK can do whatever it wants, as far as I care. I was just doing a reductio ad abusrdum (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum) to show you that your logic was faulty.
- temp8964 6y agoYou didn't. I proved your RU-US example did not fit in the context of UK-EU.
- oblio 6y agoYou proved how? Why would the EU not be allowed to publish things proving that what the UK newspaper articles are false? Is there some sort of legal principle I'm missing that says that government entities are not allowed to defend themselves from lies?