Free speech is important as you state so yourself. You seem to fundamentally misunderstand one of the most important WHY of the "digital free speech" argument.

Free speech is important as you state so yourself. You seem to fundamentally misunderstand one of the most important WHY of the "digital free speech" argument. Technologically the state can't enforce it. So if you get your wish you made a law that only spies on law-abiding citizens. In your plea we can simply start here: "data centres to be aware of the content which is hosted" Is the datacenter responsible for the content MyImages.rar? What if its password protected? What if everybody knows the password? --- Any 'techinical' solution will require extremely complex infrastructure, laws, and safeguards. A never ending bureaucratic nightmare of "does this cross the line"? and it only force the bad guys to throw the needle in a different hay stack. ( And make it more difficult for the government hackers to watch the bad guys )