It just seems utterly bizarre though. "You can buy this TV on credit, but you're only allowed to watch the news on it". "I'll loan you money to buy an oven, b

It just seems utterly bizarre though. "You can buy this TV on credit, but you're only allowed to watch the news on it". "I'll loan you money to buy an oven, but you're only allowed to roast chicken in it". For any other product it seems ridiculous, and rightly so. The car obviously has some kind of tracking device in it for them to be able to tell where it is, and that it has even violated this clause, so they can't be afraid that she'll drive off into the sunset, never to be heard from again. Aside from the Kafka factor, it also limits her to job opportunities found only in those counties, which would make it harder for her to improve her situation than if she had free movement. > These people want the same terms without the work or change in behavior. Nobody's arguing that a subprime borrower should receive the same interest rate as someone with a good credit history, but limiting the use of the vehicle is an entirely different scenario, and one I'm struggling to think of any justification for.