OK, we know these kinds of articles often get a lot of things wrong. I'm not interested in critiquing the article really cause it's boring even though I'm prett

OK, we know these kinds of articles often get a lot of things wrong. I'm not interested in critiquing the article really cause it's boring even though I'm pretty sure the journalist confused about some things. But i am interested in my own understanding. I don't know too much about these products. Ordinary Firefox was not mentioned -- maybe he's only interested in things that run on mobile? It's not clear to me. But my question about the actual topic is, is there any reason DuckDuckGo or Brave would be more privacy-protecting than ordinary Firefox, any features they have thus?