4 ms·
It's fine, I wasn't personally offended nor should you feel like you need to censor yourself. It's really difficult to justify turning uPnP off when you can't n
by kn100 6y ago
It's fine, I wasn't personally offended nor should you feel like you need to censor yourself. It's really difficult to justify turning uPnP off when you can't necessarily control every application that runs on your network. My wife is going to get rather annoyed when whatever video conferencing software she uses stops working, and I'm gonna get mad when the game I want to play doesn't work - which is why I engage in a somewhat fruitless fight with the stuff I can control to keep the uPnP port punching under control somewhat.
It's definitely a bug in the nas that it continues to punch ports no matter how it is configured. Plenty of software gives you the option of not punching ports.
- rubatuga 6y agoYou keep saying "whatever" software wouldn't work without UPnP, but you are failing to give us concrete examples.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- imwillofficial 6y agoYou are responding to His blog, and He shared His reasoning. Go find your own examples on your network. Even better if you can’t find anything and have UPNP disabled.
- zippergz 6y agoFWIW I have never had upnp enabled and I don't recall any cases where it's caused a problem for me. Certainly my wife and I are on videoconferences all day and they work fine. I am completely with you that I can't have network configurations that make the network unusable, confusing, or inconvenient for my family, but are you sure that upnp falls into that category? I'm sure you have different applications than I do, but I think we're pretty normal...
- lanstin 6y agoThis article pissed me off so I went to check on uPNP and I had disabled it when moving into this home. Never had any problem where uPNP was the solution, we have gamers, video calls, VPNs, BitTorrent, etc etc. all work fine. We even have a printer that works. I think it is calling home to Google or HP or whatever.
- alias_neo 6y agoTry it and see what happens. I build secure communications solutions for a living, so I'm speaking from experience. Any solution worth its salt doesn't want or need UPnP on your network, it doesn't need anything other than for you to let it hit the internet and for the traffic to come back the other way. I also run and have run other solutions in my day to day working from home and private life, many SIP flavours, Teams, Zoom (once, because it was the only option), Jitsi, BBB, Google Duo, Hangouts, Houseparty they all work with no effort from me. There is a lot of hypothetical about what will and won't work, but take it or leave it when I say that some of us, the people building these solutions, have a bit of a clue about networking and how to build solutions around security best-practice. I also game online with PC, Nintendo Switch and PlayStation 4/5, not one has given me issues, nor have I needed any custom firewall rules for the consoles. My wife works from home on a government issues laptop, she's never complained of issues with video conferencing or her work VPN. There may be some exceptions, sure, but it's less of an issue than people think.
- wernercd 6y ago> It's difficult to justify turning it off when Isn't it more difficult to justify keeping it on when you can't trust devices not to, literally as the article shows, punch gaping holes in your network? 4 ports and if you didn't know too look... At a bare minimum, if you MUST have uPnP, then those devices need to be on their own "unsafe" network with another network further in or next to it that has uPnP disabled.