3 ms·
my point was more general to the unsustainability of public infrastructure in sprawl prone towns. Outside of the NE corridor of Boston-NYC-Philly-DC, I don't t
by screye 6y ago
my point was more general to the unsustainability of public infrastructure in sprawl prone towns.
Outside of the NE corridor of Boston-NYC-Philly-DC, I don't think any other major US city has the density for a high coverage public toilet network.
qualifier City of Boston and SF are fake cities. The real cities of Boston and SF extend far beyond their city boundaries which capture a tiny group of neighborhoods. The real city of Boston would also fail my criterion. Small cities like Portland, Maine do well-ish, but my focus is major cities.
- nelsondev 6y agoSF already has public toilets, mainly located around the Tenderloin/SOMA, to stop people from shitting in the streets. Furthermore, even in American, geographically spread out, “driving cities”, there could still be public toilets people drive to.
- whimsicalism 6y agoI agree on Boston being a pseudo-city, disagree that SF is... Especially if you are including DC but not SF