You wrote: > The Garmin Autoland is not equivalent to full self driving? This has nothing to do with your argument criteria of: > Do you have an example of s

You wrote: > The Garmin Autoland is not equivalent to full self driving? This has nothing to do with your argument criteria of: > Do you have an example of something humans did that could kill them that was automated completely that still can kill them, but generally does not anymore? > Try not to be so condescending, sheesh. I didn't mean that to be condescending out of turn, but if you are going to engage in an argument by posting a strong disagreement and an opinion: > I strongly disagree. Most machines are not capable of killing you because it makes a mistake. You cannot change the criteria for an example that you asked for simply because you don't feel like arguing that the example did or did not meet your criteria, nor can you do so simply because you didn't bother to read it carefully. So no, I'm not being condescending out of turn, you really needed some correction on that. Sheesh.