3 ms·
You assume the drivers would shift usage to use a facility vs a bottle. Say using the bottle shaves off 15-30mins compared to the bathroom. I’m sure many would
by bushbaba 6y ago
You assume the drivers would shift usage to use a facility vs a bottle.
Say using the bottle shaves off 15-30mins compared to the bathroom. I’m sure many would still prefer to get home 15-30min early.
- random314 6y agoNo, I don't think so at all! They would much rather use a toilet!
- saghm 6y agoIt would be nice to have the option to choose though, wouldn't it?
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 6y agoAnother way to say it is that they'd rather get an extra 15-30 minutes of work done. Because if enough people start going home 15-30min early, management gets excited and raises the bar by adding work, so now you do the extra 15-30min of work (by peeing in the bottle) or risk not keeping up. I'm sure many would prefer peeing in the bottle to risking not keeping up, but that isn't the kind of choice where we say 'great, let them do it, it makes them happy.'
- Red_Leaves_Flyy 6y agoHow about we ask the drivers how they like taking a shit in an unairconditioned truck in Texas summer heat and if they'd rather have the time allowance too stop at a rest stop along their route? I, for one, having been in similar situations, would rather get home fifteen minutes later, or an hour, than shit in a bag. Or piss in a bottle.