3 ms·
John Carmack said: https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/81732190949486592 https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/81732190949486592 I agree with Microsof
by aw3c2 15y ago
John Carmack said:
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/81732190949486592 https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/81732190949486592
I agree with Microsoft’s assessment that WebGL is a severe security risk. The gfx driver culture is not the culture of security.
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/81745430152609793 https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/81745430152609793
They are orthogonal technologies, but NaCl is much, much easier to make secure than WebGL, even though it sounds scarier.
- leoc 15y agoThere's a marked contrast between Mozilla's eagerness to press ahead with WebGL and tidy up the problems later, and the abundance of caution it displays when facing NaCl, a technology that threatens its own ricebowl.