3 ms·
>If it ignores part of the spec, I don't think "strictyaml" is the correct name here. The article didn't fully explain it but strictyaml requires a typed schem
by marcinzm 6y ago
>If it ignores part of the spec, I don't think "strictyaml" is the correct name here.
The article didn't fully explain it but strictyaml requires a typed schema or defaults to string (or list or dict) if one is not provided. So it strictly follows the provided schema.
- mcv 6y agoThat makes a big difference indeed. It wasn't clear to me from the article, but string yaml + optional schema sounds like a useful combination.