3 ms·
Valid point, I stand corrected. I just can't imagine working in an environment where you have, say, 4 apps occupying 4 parts of your screen continuously. Spli
by konart 6y ago
Valid point, I stand corrected.
I just can't imagine working in an environment where you have, say, 4 apps occupying 4 parts of your screen continuously.
Splitting screen in two (terminal and browser) is the common scenario for me but you don't need i3 for this.
- peferron 6y agoI agree that you don't need i3 for the common scenario (IDE + terminal in my case). i3 is more about the myriad of uncommon scenarios that come up all the time. For example, maybe I want to keep an eye on several terminal commands at the same time. With i3 I just press the terminal shortcut n times and I have n new terminal windows sharing the space. If one of the commands fails with a long error message I press another shortcut and the terminal windows are now tabbed and full height, with the IDE still visible on the side. Or maybe I want a small browser window or Slack window in a corner to keep an eye on a meeting or discussion while I work. Whatever uncommon layout best serves my needs right now, i3 can get it done in seconds. You never really need a tiling WM, though. i3 just solves my problems really well, so well in fact that I actively enjoy using it. Some people feel the same way about vim, and you never really need vim either.