You're just assuming that everything will work out because it has for you so far and basically asking people to disprove a solution that you're assuming some pe

You're just assuming that everything will work out because it has for you so far and basically asking people to disprove a solution that you're assuming some people (i.e. not you) will come up with in the future before you're willing to believe that it is truly a problem. > I assume that we will experience food losses in both agriculture and fishing. You're underestimating the scale of losses and assuming that whatever we do (other than preventing it in the first place) will actually have any significant effects on this, which there is no evidence for. Think about fresh water losses, irrigation, and then try growing all your food inside and you'll understand.