3 ms·
Honestly it holds up pretty well. That UI isn’t quite as “pretty” as some modern UIs, but I like it better than most in terms of it just being clear, consistent
by burlesona 6y ago
Honestly it holds up pretty well. That UI isn’t quite as “pretty” as some modern UIs, but I like it better than most in terms of it just being clear, consistent, and unsurprising.
- nikau 6y agoThe only thing missing is the application search feature where you can just type the app name to find it, that's about the only decent feature win7 onwards introduced.
- phendrenad2 6y agoBack when the start menu +only+ showed programs, this wasn't necessary.
- nikau 6y agonot sure I agree, back then you had mountains of app entries with uninstall and readme and other junk all mixed in, it was tedious finding an app. now you just wack windows key, type in part of the app name and press enter.
- RedShift1 6y agoThat only worked well on Windows 7. Today the start menu search is unreliable.
- MaxBarraclough 6y agoOne brave GUI toolkit continues to use the Windows 95 look. Personally I really like that look (or design language, as we're apparently meant to say these days). Clean, high-contrast, and it's clear which widgets are clickable. It has the added bonus that its drawing operations can easily be hard-coded for excellent performance. http://www.fox-toolkit.org/ http://www.fox-toolkit.org/