4 ms·
It seems ethically dubious to publicly name a Bloomberg reporter based only on circumstantial evidence. Don’t get me wrong, it is awfully suspicious that the
by frakkingcylons 6y ago
It seems ethically dubious to publicly name a Bloomberg reporter based only on circumstantial evidence.
Don’t get me wrong, it is awfully suspicious that the stories’ timestamps match closely. But I wonder if there’s other info they have that links the reporter to Peltz.
- space_rock 6y agoWhat is the issue with circumstantial evidence? DNA evidence and fingerprint evidence is some of the most important evidence
- frakkingcylons 6y agoThere is no issue when paired with evidence that is directly incriminating. But calling someone out by name on circumstance alone is questionable (in my personal opinion).