3 ms·
Fine, but you're rationalizing living with poor execution. I'm rationalizing with deep (perhaps goldplating) correctness.
by eecc 6y ago
Fine, but you're rationalizing living with poor execution. I'm rationalizing with deep (perhaps goldplating) correctness.
- azernik 6y agoI'm not "rationalizing", and neither are you. You're arguing that it's not enough to make a correct implementation, but that it's also important to break compatibility with incorrect implementations. I'm arguing that a better implementation that is compatible with current protocols is strictly better than a better implementation that is not Bluetooth-compatible. If you make a piece of hardware that is good (e.g. doesn't randomly crash and need to be rebooted by the kernel), why is it a bad thing for it to try to connect to some flaky BT headset?