> Are you suggesting that eliminating all possible risk to ourselves and others is somehow better? That's not at all what I said. What I said was "people will

> Are you suggesting that eliminating all possible risk to ourselves and others is somehow better? That's not at all what I said. What I said was "people will put themselves and others at risk as part of tribal signaling". There's risk everywhere, but adding risk as a way to signal that you're in this group and not in that group is - at least in the case of masks - contrary to scientific progress.