> The frequency and magnitude of fraud in the penny stock market is absolutely a factual claim. Yes, that's exactly what I said. However, the article doesn't m

> The frequency and magnitude of fraud in the penny stock market is absolutely a factual claim. Yes, that's exactly what I said. However, the article doesn't make any such claim. Or maybe I missed it, because it was "implicit". What frequency or magnitude of fraud was claimed by the article? "A lot" doesn't cut it. That can mean anything to anyone.