4 ms·
I don't see the relevance of consent: you can't consent on behalf of a third party. The evidentiary question of whether a customer had actually consented to re
by NovemberWhiskey 6y ago
I don't see the relevance of consent: you can't consent on behalf of a third party.
The evidentiary question of whether a customer had actually consented to receive calls/texts from a service to which they had subscribed is separate from the question of liability for using automation to call/text a number that turns out not to belong to a customer.