3 ms·
Of course they should investigate, but journalists need to point out this is one in a million, much lower than the normal rate.
by rado 6y ago
Of course they should investigate, but journalists need to point out this is one in a million, much lower than the normal rate.
- dazc 6y agoSo, statistically, the risk of a blood clot is actually reduced?
- encryptluks2 6y agoLoL, like the flu disappearing in Washington State.
- mytailorisrich 6y agoThat's what they indeed reported in the UK because the number of blood clots allegedly caused by the vaccine is, according to what they reported, lower than would be expected in the general population.
- Erlich_Bachman 6y agoNo, the risk according to this topic is increased compared to standard rate of blood clots. (The parent comment wording was basically "wrong", meaning- giving off a false impression.)
- yread 6y agoFunnily enough, that would actually also be a warning sign. It needs to be not significantly different. Otherwise it means that the vaccine is interfering with blood coagulation, which is not what it's meant to do
- matzab 6y agoYou mean higher? This is not about "normal" blood clots. This is about cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, sometimes in conjunction with thrombocytopenia.