2 ms·
That's a biiiiig caveat you added there. I think that a guarantee of having enough money to feed yourself is better than just about any other option. I think p
by lazyasciiart 6y ago
That's a biiiiig caveat you added there.
I think that a guarantee of having enough money to feed yourself is better than just about any other option. I think people individually and collectively benefit from others holding jobs, but they can also benefit from unpaid activities like family caregiving. I think the idea that having jobs is good but nobody would do it if they didn't have to, and therefore it is good to threaten people with hunger until they are motivated enough to get one, is absolutely terrible.
- jfengel 6y agothey can also benefit from unpaid activities like family caregiving And creating art, and starting new software companies, and volunteering. There are lots of things that are worth doing but that nobody will pay for (or won't pay enough to live on). And people want to do them, but instead get pushed into literally any kind of work -- even work that we'd be better off automating or simply doing without.