7 ms·
There have been some internal debates about setting up a secondary DNS in case Route53 somehow went down. My reasoning has thusfar been that if Route53 is down,
by x3n0ph3n3 6y ago
There have been some internal debates about setting up a secondary DNS in case Route53 somehow went down. My reasoning has thusfar been that if Route53 is down, there are probably other AWS services that we depend on that would also be down.
What do you guys think? Is secondary DNS in this case worth it?
- aarmenaa 6y agoWe're moving towards dual DNS providers. We've been bit by DNS hosting failures too many times, and they're always painful because everything, including monitoring and control systems, end up dead or inaccessible. Not to mention the entire network being down is absurdly expensive if you're paying SLAs.