>the laws of thermodynamics has exceptions No, they don't. The "laws" you learn in high school are large scale approximations to the actual rules, which is cod

>the laws of thermodynamics has exceptions No, they don't. The "laws" you learn in high school are large scale approximations to the actual rules, which is codified in stat mech. It's like claiming solids are not solid because atoms... Of course physicists know all this. >General relativity (as formulated) is certainly wrong, because it precludes the possibility of small things existing Having worked on GR stuff for a long time, this is news. GR most certainly allows any size thing to exist - it's a continuous theory. >Quantum mechanics (as formulated) is certainly wrong, because it precludes the possibility of curved spacetime No, it does not. QM in curved spacetime is so old and well understood it has a Wikipedia page [1] - from which you can start digging back into the literature. You should really google such claims when making them to be sure you understand what you're claiming. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory_in_curved_spacetime https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory_in_curved...