3 ms·
Fantastic. Not on-board with the ^^^^ syntax - could be improved. But it reminds me of how sequential-character syntax is limiting, like if you were going to ma
by MarkLowenstein 6y ago
Fantastic. Not on-board with the ^^^^ syntax - could be improved. But it reminds me of how sequential-character syntax is limiting, like if you were going to make an integrated circuit in strict 2 dimensions, without being able to bridge over traces sometimes in a minimally 3-dimensional way. This is like bringing programming into, literally, a new dimension.
- anthony_romeo 6y agoPerhaps they could make use of all of those box-drawing characters that are just taking up space, and use them to pipe the characters in all sorts of directions! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box-drawing_character https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box-drawing_character
- lifthrasiir 6y agoEh, like Funciton? https://esolangs.org/wiki/Funciton https://esolangs.org/wiki/Funciton