3 ms·
>This is meaningless to agree with or disagree with since the value of the results is what is in question. How are you judging the value of the results? I am n
by passivate 6y ago
>This is meaningless to agree with or disagree with since the value of the results is what is in question.
How are you judging the value of the results? I am not understanding your point here. Again, back to my original question, please propose alternate metrics, otherwise we're just arguing over minutia that misses the meat of the discussion.
- zepto 6y ago> I am not understanding your point here. I know. > Again, back to my original question, please propose alternate metrics That’s not actually necessary in order to understand what I’m saying. In fact it would be a distraction.
- passivate 6y agoI much rather steer the conversation towards solutions rather than engage over abstract "good" and "bad" terms which you don't seem to want to define. In any event, we have reached a point of disagreement, which is fine with me, so lets leave it at that. Have a nice day.
- zepto 6y ago> I much rather steer the conversation towards solutions rather than engage over abstract "good" and "bad" terms which you don't seem to want to define. That’s not really how it looked earlier in the thread. You seemed to be strongly defending the idea that engagement is good, and not even accepting that there could be a problem. Perhaps that’s a misreading of your intention.