> But there also was a dotcom bubble 20 years ago. Does that mean that the World Wide Web is useless? No. But the web's sole claim to usefulness wasn't as a "s

> But there also was a dotcom bubble 20 years ago. Does that mean that the World Wide Web is useless? No. But the web's sole claim to usefulness wasn't as a "store of value". Just as well it was useful for other things, because it turned out that speculator driven bubbles aren't superior places to store value...