4 ms·
Per capita. Florida did anomalously well given its seemingly poor handling of the situation. It's likely related to the fact that California has 3 of the 10 big
by chc 6y ago
Per capita. Florida did anomalously well given its seemingly poor handling of the situation. It's likely related to the fact that California has 3 of the 10 biggest cities in the US while Florida has 0, but that doesn't seem like enough to fully explain it.
- 908B64B197 6y agoDensity and demographics are two interesting points. SF and LA are pretty dense in some areas, and not very car-friendly. Florida skews heavily toward relatively well-off retiree who might already be a little more socially distanced than the norm.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- undefined1 6y agomaybe, but in terms of density overall; CA: 253.9 residents per square mile FL: 397.2 residents per square mile
- 908B64B197 6y agoLarge chunks of land in CA are completely deserted and uninhabitable. What's more interesting is the local density; what does the distributions of residents per square miles looks like.
- alphabettsy 6y agoShould probably compare places where people live. Including the vast parts of CA that are empty desert skews this stat.
- undefined1 6y agothat would be helpful. is there a stat that does that? removing empty CA desert and empty FL swamp?