3 ms·
You make a valid statement, but it doesn't appear to valid in this case. I don't think the demographics of this platform fall under that umbrella. If someone on
by y-c-o-m-b 6y ago
You make a valid statement, but it doesn't appear to valid in this case. I don't think the demographics of this platform fall under that umbrella. If someone on here is asking for more information and articulating their reasons for it well, there's no reason to hide it. There's also an equal risk that if people don't know enough about the vaccines, they won't get any of them at all let alone deciding which to get. Seldom is it that I believe withholding information will have a better effect than being adequately transparent; keyword here being adequate because you still need to explain and emphasize strongly in plain English why it would be detrimental to wait it out.
Treating people like idiots yields worse results than making them believe they're intelligent (be it true or not). You can look at our political landscape for evidence of that. That's just my opinion of course.
- toofy 6y ago> I don't think the demographics of this platform fall under that umbrella. If someone on here is asking for more information and articulating their reasons for it well, there's no reason to hide it. The data is available. No one is hiding it. No one is treating people like idiots. Those with expertise in pandemics may not consider every single internet comment made by every single internet random, but honestly, it would be ridiculous to think every internet random’s comment should have the same weight as those with expertise. The data is not hidden, we’re all free to analyze it.