>If they just focused on getting it over the net as simply as possible, the end result usually means less code that's easier to understand. I'm sure there's so

>If they just focused on getting it over the net as simply as possible, the end result usually means less code that's easier to understand. I'm sure there's some range of nuance to your point, but it's also in line with the iterative philosophy isn't it? Do you find patching/revising things later to skew better/worse or some other downstream consequences? It seems like you find that approach more efficient overall?