The CEO is also founder and held onto a super majority share of the stock. It's his board essentially, which was a governance issue I remember seeing identified

The CEO is also founder and held onto a super majority share of the stock. It's his board essentially, which was a governance issue I remember seeing identified as an investment risk years ago. If it wasn't for that he might have been pushed on a long ways back, but there it is. There's risks to both full submission the shareholders and full independence of shareholders.