Emphatically not. There is an important difference between 'outlandish' and 'in flagrant contradiction with billions of experimental results [0]'. I am not say

Emphatically not. There is an important difference between 'outlandish' and 'in flagrant contradiction with billions of experimental results [0]'. I am not saying that the difference is always easy to spot, but I think that you cannot deny that it exists. [0] For a crude estimate, see 'number of collisions per second' at https://home.cern/resources/faqs/facts-and-figures-about-lhc https://home.cern/resources/faqs/facts-and-figures-about-lhc . And those people are looking really hard for possible violations of the law of conservation of momentum: in this context it is called 'missing transverse energy' and it is a key method in the search for new physics.